Last night, round about 400 people muddled through steady rain to reach John Jay High School Auditorium and register their support for or argue against the redesigned Prospect Park West. Soooooo much has already been said about this project and now the
lawsuit filed against the DOT for insufficient community engagement, project monitoring, and data falsification in its process. And it's touched off debate about the role of bicycles on streets more generally. The
NYTimes,
New Yorker (
and also),
NY Daily News, and
New York Observer have all run pieces that play up the street reallocative scandal here.
(photo of pedal demonstration supporting challenged PPW bike lanes, Oct 2010)
Most portray a wild-eyed, unstoppable and unreasonable Transportation Commissioner who's got ludicrous ideas about what street space is for in this town. And her defenders have also
come to the rescue; the letters written to
the Times after l
ast Sunday's truly stilted portrayal by Michael Grynbaum. But some articles--including the above-referenced
Observer piece and of course the
Streetsblog's reliable coverage, plus
this piece by Aaron Naparstek, and also
the Guardian's bike blog piece that ran this week--are speculating on the underlying tension in this vociferous "culture war"--and what's at stake for anyone who doesn't live here. In some way or another, these latter articles agree that the vitriol invoked by the multiplying, slow-moving obstructions in our streets reveal a clash over future city visions for New York.
I agree.
Unless we open a conversation about what street apparitions impede our forward thought about paving a next, stay-able place, lots of senior citizens will die thinking that the car was their generation's savior. Instead, I'd like to see these seniors coaxed back out of doors--especially car doors--and let themselves imagine that their slowing pace of life is actually en vogue, a growing trend among bike and ped commuters.
"How can we humane street lovers help these neighbors find the courage and hope to tune their ears to the word on the street?"
--I found myself thinking last night while approximately 10 elderly people from the lawsuit-filing coalition Neighbors for Better Bike Lanes + Seniors for Safety suggested that cyclist proliferation is more dangerous than speeding cars, and that a high speed, car-crowded street was easier to cross, look at, and fall asleep to at night.
Heck! even these mean streets' signs aren't shouting anymore!
Should I get a tandem or my very own passenger cargo bike and offer free rides to these folks? A cyclist-eye view of PPW and many other City streets could help them see that this _is
their moment_--the moment when the earlier
anti-car battles for slow spaces, lost by their parents are being re-opened. How could they forget what it was like when the streets were their playground?
Or have I got my generations mixed up?
Anyhow, whether they want them for stoopball or pinochle, I'd love to get my fearful, aging neighbors out into their quieting streets and using their twilight years to bring about a more humane City.
Anyhow, I slapped together a little meditation along these lines--something of a paean to NYCDOT --and tried to deliver it at last night's hearing.
Sadly, I was a little late in the queue for the invocation, and too early for the benediction, so i've got this mostly unheard sermon I thought I'd post up...
Community Board 6 Public Hearing
Remarks to the Transportation Committee
10 March 2011
First, I want to thank Councilman Lander and the CB6 transportation committee for your leadership on the issue of what streets we need in this community. Your diligent monitoring and public relations efforts speak volumes about your concern for the well-being of all who travel or live along PPW.
And thank you DOT for your patience with us: we realize your job is to move along and improve safety and mobility all over the city, and we’re holding you and our neighboring boroughs’ mobility needs captive.
But I also want to thank you because, as trained planners and engineers, you know what generations of favoring cars have wrought in this City and your vision for a hopeful future is what has you working so hard for us.
First, there was the hollowing of the city by car owners who chose distance and single family homes over our City’s advantages.
And as they went, so too did many of these advantages.
These same commuters’ daily tidal flows to and from our City bound its perimeters like a noose, and tore in half communities like the South Bronx and Sunset Park, Brooklyn.
And soon people-vacated streets made us want to move through them as quickly as possible, in sealed steel and glass. And while we hid from those streets, crime increased. So did traffic crashes and rates of serious injury and fatality in them.
More people left and a drag on property values jeopardized the City’s ability to provide for quality services for those who chose to remain.
And of course the outer boroughs took the hit in the most lasting way, and to this day have the longest commutes and most spread out lifestyles, least accessible public transport and… highest car ownership rates. Many saw the car as their only vehicle for upward mobility--a tragic irony since it is the single most expensive and least efficient form of transport.
Whether filling the streets during the day or overnighting curbside, more cars also brought incredible volumes of CO2 particulate and exacerbated industrial pollutants, yielding shocking rates of asthma and other respiratory illness, particularly in poor communities situated next to highways.
So, thank you, NYCDOT, thank you Commissioner Sadik-Khan, and thank you Mayor Bloomberg for your bold leadership on our streets. Your foresight to lay down new pathways for the 1 million residents we will welcome in the coming couple of decades is saving us. You are protecting our future from a repeat fate.
We ask for your patience while we get over these fear-filled memories of a time when cars were our local safety and getaway vehicles.
Be assured that under your leadership, we’re learning to look at our streets and ask them to become as good for people to stay in as they are to move through.
We’re learning to expect our streets
to make us healthier, to bring us together,
to take better care of our children and seniors,
to enhance our valuable parks,
and feed vibrant, local businesses that don’t depend on car traffic.
By laying down pedestrian plazas in intersections once a tangled morass, you’re showing us how much we wanted to sit around together and steal a little sunshine in between morning and afternoon work shifts.
And by installing thoughtfully-designed, separate cycle tracks and bikeways such as the stunning addition up yonder rimming our park, you’re
Saving lives,
relieving our strained and cash-strapped transit system,
drawing us out of doors, out of cars and into our skin,
making it safe for parents and their kids to commute by bike together.
Together, these interventions are doing more than anything to preserve New York’s qualities worth staying for because:
what happens in these streets doesn’t stay in these streets.
All these improvements spread through our City circulatory system as nutrients to sustain healthier destinations—residential and commercial. And this is why the US government has always upheld the status of streets as a commons—to protect their anchorless benefits that do not just accrue to the places they run through. They, too, ought to be put to their highest and best use.
Devoting precious public space to private car parking and speedy throughput is a city-stultifying proposition.
The privilege of living in New York has to do with its smallness, and all the resources we can access very locally—on foot and on bicycle and transit.
The more we do this, the more of that kind of close, convenient, familiar New York we invite. And this is a New York worth staying in.
Cars are for leaving, and if we return them to street pole position, our growing city will go with them.